| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Daan Sai
HAZCON Inc
   |
Posted - 2008.08.27 15:29:00 -
[1]
Shame on CCP for such a short sighted, unannounced, pointless, negative, and diminishing-to-the-game move. I only hope it was by an ignorant newbie GM who really should know better and it will be corrected soon
|
Daan Sai
HAZCON Inc
|
Posted - 2008.08.27 15:39:00 -
[2]
I hope everyone heading north for the fanfest will be asking pointed questions to CCP people in person, because they sure are not forthcoming here...
|
Daan Sai
HAZCON Inc
|
Posted - 2008.08.27 16:22:00 -
[3]
Is there any way to escalate this and make contact directly with, say, Oveur and get an official response on this? The frustration is building, and CCPs new forum policies are not helping here.
I think Ethaet summed up nicely how it feels:
http://go-dl1.eve-files.com/media/0808/chribbahate.jpg
Part of CCP obviously likes what the Chribba and the Veldnaught does for the game, but some other part is intent on just throwing away the goodwill. .
|
Daan Sai
HAZCON Inc
|
Posted - 2008.08.27 16:34:00 -
[4]
 Originally by: Cailais
Until now I figured the nano-nerf/suicide-gank nerf/nos nerf/damp nerf/nano-nerf etc etc were just CCP adapting towards a greater plan a 'better' plan, but one which still enabled players to become icons in a sandbox universe.
Seems like the original visionaries who got EVE focussed and going are long gone, and we now have a bunch of late comers who mean well, but lack any broad vision or context for what they are doing, acting incoherently. Sign of rapid expansion in a small company perhaps?
|
Daan Sai
HAZCON Inc
|
Posted - 2008.08.27 16:37:00 -
[5]
Originally by: Traidor Disloyal
Does Cribba have a piece of paper issued by CCP that says he has a right to have a cap ship in High Sec.
Effectively yes, he and all the high sec cap owners did, there were in place a set of rules governing the situation, that have worked fine for years.
He built it when it was perfectly legal to do so, this just smacks of ignorance (hopefully) or retrospective legislation (shudder).
|
Daan Sai
HAZCON Inc
|
Posted - 2008.08.27 16:56:00 -
[6]
Originally by: Buildius Maximus
Reverse the policy CCP
LOL, they just did, we want them to reinstate the long standing policy. 
But, yeah, they should fix this mess.
|
Daan Sai
HAZCON Inc
|
Posted - 2008.08.27 19:56:00 -
[7]
Thank goodness this was resolved sensibly. Thanks GM Gimmi and CCP for manning up and putting it right.
Cheers to the Veldnaught and all the other highsec Caps, long may they float.
|
| |
|